June 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Stat

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 04/2004

Syndication

« Ape to Man | Main | Rabbi Gafni's uncertain past? »

August 10, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834569a8169e200d8345256b953ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Zen Master" Rama and Big Mind process?:

Comments

Vince

"Why would anyone legitimate want to associate their teaching or community with that?"

I am familiar with the Frederick P. Lenz Foundation. They provide funding for programs that I would say doing very cool things... Big Mind is certainly one of them, but there are two I am personally involved with: Naropa University & the Great Mountain Zen Center. The Lenz foundation offers a few scholarships annually to students in the Religious Studies department (the department I happen to be in), and they are quite helpful in a field where there is very little grant money available. Furthermore, a teacher of mine, also a member of the white plum sangha, and all around great guy is developing a process called "Great Heart Zen" which is a combination of traditional zen practice and western psychological methods. Both of these organizations are doing wonderful things.

Granted Lenz was a strange dude, no question about it, he did take a fortune and create this foundation, which in the past two years has given close to half a million dollars towards what I would describe as very helpful endeavors. The foundation seems to be primarily interested in supporting programs that help "Westerners in a modern, fast-paced America achieve spiritual enlightenment, without religious ceremony." Sounds pretty solid to me, and regardless of whether or not Lenz was weird, I don't see taking advantage of the resources he offers as any sort of permission to be unethical. Indeed, if I were a teacher myself who needed funding I would weigh the potential benefit of what I was trying to accomplish, and put that up against the weirdness of dude who is dead (and who very well could have been brilliantly enlightened) and any uneasiness I would have associating with the foundation, which 17 years after his death, is offering money to help my vision become a reality. Seems like a pretty obvious win to me.

Shawn

Hey Vince,

Thanks for the comment and all the info! It is good to know that the grant money from this Foundation is going to good causes. I would like to know more about the "Great Heart Zen" - as you know I have a great interest in Zen practice and Western psych so would love to check it out.

As for taking funds from the Foundation, I guess I see it as a double-edged sword in a way. I mean if I knew nothing of Genpo Roshi, Big Mind or these other centers using the grant money and did some research on Lenz I'd probably stear way clear of them even though they could be legit. So like you said it would be cost/benefit - do you take the funds which could help your center help others or do you pass and not risk alienating those that are truly interested but hesitant to become involved with a Center associated with whole 'Zen Master' Rama fiasco.

The thing is many teachers have gotten caught up in the 'money and sex' problems as Ken has pointed out before even though they seem to have some form of realization/awakening based on their teachings. For some reason from what I've read so far of this Lenz dude I don't see much that rings true in terms of Dharma and a lot that rings of 'money and sex' problems even though obviously he was a very intelligent (cognitive line) man. But who knows...

ebuddha

Shawn,

I don't think there is any doubt that the Rama, as he was called, was pretty a pretty messed up guy.
However, I also think not it is better not to be too condemning with the whole "7 degrees of separation" thing, especially when it comes to grant money. Think of all the art stuff and foundations set up by Alcoa, IBM, etc. If you start digging into most corporations, you find some pretty messed up stuff.

All the use of sweat labor, the defilement of the environment, the wielding of IBM's battery of lawyers like a cudgel, as a tool to buy up startups at cheap prices, etc.

Even on the personal level, think of who has come out of the Da Free John scene, or the OSHO scene (both pretty messed up dudes as well.) There's a whole stable of teachers there, some of which are absolutely genuine, some of which - well, not so much.

Basically who you are associated with in the past (when you were a little less naive and foolish than you are now) should never condemn what a person is doing now, right?

Tuff Ghost

Notice that Brad Warner hasn't actually claimed to have tried the Big Mind process, or holosync for that matter. His ideas on what meditation/Buddhism must be are frustratingly stubborn. "That's not Zen! THIS is Zen! And I'm the rootin' tootin' toughest Zen cowboy in town!"

He also wrongly characterized Wilber's 11 day constant consciousness as Zen sickness, which from my (admittedly limited) understanding, is the propensity for always hanging out in the causal, thus shunning the world, not constant consciousness per se.

That's not to say that Warner doesn't make lots of good points, or that the Big Mind process is (like holosync) suspiciously upbeat about its claims. However, they provide a system, and it will live and die on peer review (the problem with the price of some of the systems is another story).

So to an extent it doesn't matter that Genpo Roshi recieves funding from the Lenz Foundation. If Big Mind works, if it really can give you a little satori within hours (I'm also doubtful, but I have no right to claim anything until I've tried it) then it doesnt matter if Genpo Roshi is a 30ft drug taking meerkat.

david

I studied with Rama/Dr. Lenz from 1992-1998. I'm not going to try to whitewash all the criticisms about Dr. Lenz' personal life or his controversial behaviors. However, I do want to observe that I had genuine experiences of satori around him, experiences that I had not had with anyone else and have not been able to repeat elsewhere. I still meditate regularly using the techniques Dr. Lenz taught, simply because those techniques--regardless of how fucked up Dr. Lenz might have been on a personal level--work. They work very well indeed, at least for me.

When teachers such as Dr. Lenz are criticized, there is always (to me) a hidden assumption that there should be some type of correlation between a teacher's ethics and their ability to go into samadhi. I see no reason why such a correlation should exist and it always surprises me that people are surprised when people who can go into samadhi behave in less than ethical ways. To me there is no correlation at all and no reason why there should be.

I mean, we see sports stars who are great role models and others whose personal lives leave something to be desired. But this doesn't cause us to question their sports abilities. The same is true of business leaders, rock stars, and politicians.

If it is revealed that Magic Johnson slept with a lot of women, or that Pete Rose was a big gambler, we do not suddenly question their basketball or baseball abilities. But if it is revealed that Dr. Lenz charged his students thousands of dollars in dubious fees, suddenly his meditation abilities are called into question. There is no correlation.

david

Also, he died in 1998, not in 1988. At first I thought that was just a typo but then someone else erroneously referred to him being dead for 17 years--in fact, he has only been dead for 7 years.

The difference is important because after 7 years, some of the social structures still exist from his time alive, although in another 10 years they probably won't. It was a very close knit social structure when he was alive. Although after 7 years people are beginning to drift apart, many people have kept in pretty close touch. Also, large subgroups have gone on to other teachers en masse, most notably Adi Da (Frank Jones) and Siva Baba (Baskaran Pillai). When a group of Rama students migrates en masse to a new teacher, they seem to take a lot of characteristics of Dr. Lenz as a teacher with them them. The new teacher--especially in the case of Adi Da and Siva Baba--ends up getting reinvented in Rama's image even if they had years of pre-1998 teaching experience.

Many of the students have gone out and now teach on their own as well--and they have tended to bring both Dr. Lenz' good habits and his bad habits with them. Within this mini-Lenz communities, there is still much samadhi and much abuse to be found. The more things change, the more they remain the same I guess. If I were totally honest, I would find both many good things and many bad things to say about what the sangha has done in the years since Dr. Lenz' death.

My point is simply that, given perhaps that it has only been 7 years, there is much going on in Dr. Lenz' name beyond the official activities of the Foundation, both for good and for ill. The Foundation is the only group with the official legal right to act in Dr. Lenz' name. But that certainly shouldn't be taken to mean that there aren't many people acting or claiming to act unofficially in his name.

david

One other point which may be relevant: the Foundation has only really been active for about 3 years. Although it was officially established upon Dr. Lenz' death, a long legal dispute with the Audobon Society tied up the money until about 3 years ago. So it is quite early in the life of the Foundation and probably too soon to pass judgement, either positive or negative. Yet I agree with others who are favorably impressed with what the Foundation has been able to accomplish thus far. They do seem to be very clean in terms of getting money to the right people--I think they reflect the positive, not the negative, side of Dr. Lenz.

Mark E. Laxer

Thoughtful thread, here.

I'd agree, that the grants thus far seem to reflect the positive, not the negative side of Lenz. One hopes that, behind the Foundation's curtain, there's not the same type of behavior characterized by Lenz' deep slide that his inner circle got to know so well.

One hopes, too, that the institutions receiving the Foundation's grants don't contribute to the whitewashing of Lenz' image and to ignoring the lessons gained from his abusive behavior. On reflection, by accepting the money, they already have.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.